Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/07/25]

From: Michael G Schwern
Subject: Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"
Date: 22:03 on 25 Jul 2005
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:08:48PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:55:07PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> > Or we'd end up with the godawful-horrific-clawing-your-eyes-out-in-pain mess
> > that is the current Class::DBI plugin landscape, where your OWN BLOODY
> > NAMESPACE suddenly sprouts all these methods that weren't there a minute
> > ago. 
> 
> Although I pretty much agree with you in theory, pretty much the entire
> central concept of Class::DBI is the dynamic generation of methods in
> your namespace ....

You can blame me for that one, and I still have not repented on that design
choice.

Anyhow, it appears DBIx::Class does the same thing...?  Are we talking about
the column accessors (which DBIx::Class appears to use) or the idea of 
mixin plugins?


        -- 
        Michael G Schwern     schwern@xxxxx.xxx     http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
You are wicked and wrong to have broken inside and peeked at the
implementation and then relied upon it.
	-- tchrist in <31832.969261130@chthon>

(message missing)

Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"
Michael G Schwern 22:03 on 25 Jul 2005

Delegation vs Hooks (was: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out")
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 23:27 on 26 Jul 2005

Generated at 16:37 on 28 Jul 2005 by mariachi v0.52