Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/07/25]

From: Matt S Trout
Subject: Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"
Date: 22:44 on 25 Jul 2005
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:59:47PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:54:55PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > I like to drag out that paper from time to time to give Tony nightmares.
> 
> The *real* nightmares come from the comment in the CVS tree when I took
> it over that said, in relation to one of the proposed classes into which
> Class::DBI was about to be decomposed:
> 
> # Should Class::DBI inherit from this or vice-versa... or both?

Any chance of that list of proposed classes and the related notes? I
think that might be rather interesting even if only from a historical
perspective point of view.

        -- 
             Matt S Trout           Website: http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk
  Technical Director        E-mail:  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.

(message missing)

Re: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out"
Matt S Trout 22:44 on 25 Jul 2005

Delegation vs Hooks (was: Annouce: DBIx::Class, a.k.a "taking the easy way out")
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 23:27 on 26 Jul 2005

Generated at 16:37 on 28 Jul 2005 by mariachi v0.52